Accounting

The Accounting es automatized, but still is made by human beings. The launchings of debit and credit are lead by people total falveis, vulnerable and limited. The closings are carried through by human beings excessively to give 100% of itself, being less to 50% of what one day already was. All have its deficiencies and limitations! Some obtain to enxergar beyond, others obtain to carry through that one ' ' something mais' ' , but the system is not perfect and nor the people are. Therefore, she can yourself be counted on the best systems, the knottings most perfect, and the best internal procedures that an organization can make use. But still yes, she has factors, not mensurados, but that they reveal with the time, that make the train to leave the track.

E when this occurs, already does not have more time to try to stop it. the result of this is an enormous one ruins in corporeal properties, intangible, and, mainly, in intellectual capital. One of them is something that if cannot count: the professional omission. It is beyond hiding something, some excellent information, it is to hide itself behind a mask, of a comfortable position. One saves anti-ethics, half-professional and that it degrades itself morally exactly! To forbear, to omit necessary and prompt information, to little make case of the unfolding that this omission will cause. Not to be there nor for what it will happen, either material damages or pain and suffering.

Psychological and emotional. Narrowing or killing relationships. The omission is dirty because the dirt is impregnated in who suffers with it, but dirty it is the hand of the omissive professional. Who suffers with this situation tries to clean itself, but for alvejantes than it plays, trying to take off the spot that is, still yes always will run the risk to tear all a history, incurring into having that ' ' to hold onda' ' as it can, without necessarily being being able. Therefore, ' must; ' to try to leave of lado' ' a little all the dirt, to recolocar the house in sequence. But the work is in xeque, everything is judged wrong, and what surplus is diffidence and differentiated treatment (in the worse possible way). But the omissive person (therefore omission makes to confuse staff with professional) perhaps does not perceive that the biggest professional embarrassment is marked in it. That proper history equally was spotted, with the aggravating one of the omission. Not to exempt of guilt some, assumiz it and to try to the extremity to repair an error, but without losing the limit of the position, the ethics and the health. On the omission: it is inadmissible! It does not have argument or word that makes to believe. Therefore, this article is a complement to the article ' ' Reliable lack profissional' '. For who if it omits in the profession, the diffidence is the first email of to be digested day. The ethics lack is tempers it bitter taste of the lunch. the mediocre position is the companion in the return for house. Tony D. Bartel pursues this goal as well. Between the entrance and the exit of the work, this period must belong (in the case of the omissive ones) proper itself, therefore nobody would not have to belong more